HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory14.3 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '16 at 10:59
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5645
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 120
53% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 370
34% 286 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
HP(103C 0780) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5456
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
93GB free
Firmware: 07.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 97
Write 61.1
Mixed 77
59% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.42
104% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 94
Write 90
Mixed 73.6
64% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.25
62% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
5GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 132
Write 86.2
Mixed 88.4
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.29
78% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 85%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
2GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 32.6
Mixed 31.4
43% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.19
65% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CK0 58GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 17.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback