Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2600 2,255 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	24.8% Poor	Memory 46.1 1-Core 7 2-Core 13.4 18% 22.2 Pts	4-Core 22.7 8-Core 22.3 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 23.1 1% 23.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0624) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1075 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 98 98 99 100 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 197 Write 98 Mixed 132 SusWrite 93.4 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 14.1 50% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 95.6 79% 115 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664HZ-1G6M1 1x2GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16