Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-240 462 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 53 1-Core 11 2-Core 11.2 21% 25.1 Pts	4-Core 9.6 8-Core 8.8 1% 9.2 Pts	64-Core 13.7 1% 13.7 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250 Graphics 23 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 9803) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.947.0.0 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160212SCE 160GB 1,489 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AC SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 16 23 23 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 59 Write 30.4 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 22.4 27% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix DMT351E6EFR8C-H9 1x4GB 439 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 47384 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.51% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 3.6 8% 2.73 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.7 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 9.51% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16