Asrock A785GM-LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive7.59% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A785GM-LE  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110829
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '15 at 13:35
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 127
43% 95 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 247
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
PwrHis(1787 201C) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.2% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 54.2
34% 42.1 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 37.5
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PB22-JS3 TH 64GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM19D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Read 82.4
Write 50.6
Mixed 86.2
16% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.96
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.04
4% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 28%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 133
Mixed 92.8
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.43
108% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 86%
Typical A785GM-LE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A785GM-LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $615
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback