Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1536 x 864 - 32 Bit colors, , , ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 14:53
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6154
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
Memory 49.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 187
64% 117 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 448
60% 446 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M10-1B
Nvidia(10DE 11CD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 412.31
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 15.2
13% 15.4 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 16.2
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 235
Write 187
Mixed 222
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 7.3
24% 7.47 MB/s
DQ Read 50.5
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 148
103% 123 MB/s
Nutanix VDISK 129GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 192 186 144 148 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 6.6
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback