Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$110 5,651 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Memory 16.9 1-Core 8.7 2-Core 17.2 10% 14.3 Pts	4-Core 30.3 8-Core 46.5 5% 38.4 Pts	64-Core 46.6 3% 46.6 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB 11,477 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 237 225 237 239 237 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.4% Poor	Read 216 Write 238 Mixed 120 SusWrite 235 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 4.2 14% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 101%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$62 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 699GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 125 125 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 127 Write 122 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 125 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 9905428-155.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 32GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 8.3 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 2.3 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 344 12% 344 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1,019x
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	341x
Quadro K4100MNvidiaBench 16%, 1,157 samples	192x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	85x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	82x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	51x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $400

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16