Today's hottest deals

Medionpc MS-7046

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedionpc MS-7046  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7046
Memory0.2 GB free of 0.75 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20040714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '19 at 17:47
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 30.8
12% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 30.5
8-Core 33.5
4% 32 Pts
64-Core 33.5
2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 560
Nvidia(10DE 034A) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.12
1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 12 13 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Read 13.6
Write 11.8
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 10.8
10% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback