Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 136%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJun 01 '19 at 18:03
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
SC Int 129
SC Float 132
SC Mixed 130
104% 130 Pts
QC Int 515
QC Float 527
QC Mixed 496
116% 513 Pts
MC Int 968
MC Float 1,038
MC Mixed 1,015
151% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$709
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (100 fps cap detected)
37.3% Below average
Lighting 100
Reflection 100
Parallax 100
31% 100 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 100
Splatting 100
42% 100 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 175%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1279 874 880 878 880 875 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,704
Write 2,545
Mixed 1,901
SusWrite 944
453% 2,023 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 100
338% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 919
589% 652 MB/s
Poor: 222%
This bench: 294%
Great: 337%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$120
165GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 412 411 407 393 328 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 483
Mixed 426
SusWrite 394
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 58.8
201% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 154
162% 265 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 121%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$103
137GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 412 411 408 410 422 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 490
Mixed 385
SusWrite 412
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 64.5
212% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 287
221% 299 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 135%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$330
425GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 413 412 409 411 423 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 472
Mixed 411
SusWrite 413
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 65.8
219% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 217
178% 248 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 125%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 34.4
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 27.1
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 47
85% 47 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 2,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $974
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $709Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $720SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback