Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5667 365 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 168 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 381 42% 329 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000 751 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 0770) 2.5GB CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 20.3 Parallax 14.6 11% 16.1 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 17.5 14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240 240GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 124 124 123 84 67 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 127 Write 125 Mixed 118 SusWrite 100 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 19 72% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 79.1 DQ Write 94.1 DQ Mixed 73.4 59% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 931GB free Firmware: A41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 121 121 121 121 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 124 Write 121 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 114 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 79%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 16GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2GB free, PID 16a5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 25 23 17 11 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 23.9 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 17.5 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.9 61% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 50GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16