HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 92 2-Core 189 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 469 49% 395 Pts	64-Core 476 29% 476 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 270 275 274 274 274 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 453 Write 342 Mixed 161 SusWrite 278 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 18.3 64% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 48.7 DQ Mixed 64.4 55% 83 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 108%
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 91GB free Firmware: 07TA SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 271 257 251 252 268 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 396 Write 262 Mixed 250 SusWrite 257 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 14.2 78% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 23.5 68% 145 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB 2,051 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 110 110 109 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 79.2 Write 105 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 109 67% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 174% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 68%
Seagate Desktop 2TB 3,779 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 43GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 37.8 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 38.8 48% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	227x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	197x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	492x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	297x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $99Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16