Average Bench: 3.91% (356th of 630)

Based on 3,565 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0FFC Model: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K1000M averaged 96.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 14.4fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 12.1fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K1000M is just 0.78%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K1000M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 10.2fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 13.5fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,565 samples)
Min Avg Max
9.94 Lighting 12.1 12.9
9.2 Reflection 10.2 10.4
11.3 Parallax 13.5 14.6
3.17% 11.9 fps
Min Avg Max
9.8 MRender 10.4 10.7
11.5 Gravity 14.4 15
12.7 Splatting 15.1 16
3.97% 13.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 13.9
3% 12.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 15.5
4% 13.6 fps
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.25
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 13.9
3% 12.1 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 15.6
4% 13.6 fps
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.25
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 13.9
3% 12.2 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 15.7
4% 13.5 fps
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.32
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 13.7
3% 12.1 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 15.4
4% 13.4 fps
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 13.3
3% 12 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 15.3
4% 13.2 fps
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.72
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 14.1
3% 12.2 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 14.4
4% 12.4 fps
3,565 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,623,088 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 3,565 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 176B) 58% 4% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21F5) 20% 4% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21F6) 9% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 153E) 7% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 053E) 4% 4% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 175E) 2% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 1631) 0% 4% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 7104) 0% 4% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K1000M Builds (Compare 2,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $353

Popular Quadro K1000M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

14 months ago.

Bcoz i have this gpu and it is awesome


Your
opinion?
630 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback