Fujitsu CELSIUS W580

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W580  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3617-A1
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 10:30
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2126G
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 732
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
HP(103C 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.81
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 19.2
19% 21.7 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 20.8
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 827 561 563 547 542 526 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 948
Write 885
Mixed 768
SusWrite 594
179% 799 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 66.7
236% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 1,512
DQ Write 1,344
DQ Mixed 1,390
1,053% 1,416 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 210%
Great: 296%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
847GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 175 180 158 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 145
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 168
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 107%
WDC WD32 00AAKX-083CA1 320GB
55GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.8% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 33
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 38.1
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 24
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.9
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W580 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback