Asus X756UA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X756UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X756UA
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 28 '19 at 23:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 104
50% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 163
20% 155 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1D7D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6136
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 6.22
5% 7.24 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 12.5
8% 8.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 80 81 83 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 28.4
Write 68.7
Mixed 24
SusWrite 77.5
36% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 57%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 118 120 115 111 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 127
Write 104
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 115
137% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 9.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X756UA Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X756UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback