Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140923
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '16 at 01:41
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 92 2-Core 181 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 337 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 843D) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4196 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4285 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1258 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 59 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11356322830	71.1% Very good	Read 269 Write 213 Mixed 142 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 35.8 127% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 96 95% 154 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 12GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	62x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	35x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	33x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	17x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	11x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	9x
99U5474-038.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 45%, 1,347 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16