| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Alienware 18 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware 0FT9KT |
| Memory | 23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150904 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 15 '19 at 01:35 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.7%
Good
|
73% 128 Pts
|
35% 222 Pts
|
24% 394 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980M
Dell(1028 05AB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.2%
Below average
|
39% 41.4 fps
|
22% 27.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SMS200S3480G 480GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 158 170 157 137 129 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
54% 243 MB/s
|
66% 19 MB/s
|
59% 86.3 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56
706GB free
Firmware: AX0P2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 18 33 17 MB/s
|
7.78%
Terrible
|
10% 14.1 MB/s
|
6% 0.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$29
465GB free
Firmware: DEM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 83 85 86 85 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
38% 52 MB/s
|
462% 3.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.2%
Above average
|
57% 20.1 GB/s
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
49% 81.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 18 Builds (Compare 366 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware 18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples | 61x |
| Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples | 58x |
| Core i7-4710MQIntel $48Bench 60%, 15,557 samples | 54x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 880MNvidiaBench 28%, 2,147 samples | 106x |
| GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples | 53x |
| GTX 780MNvidiaBench 23%, 3,739 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $239 |