ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu E8420

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu E8420 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB1F6
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '19 at 16:06
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$182 1,008 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43% Average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 43.6 2-Core 82.3 43% 66.1 Pts	4-Core 83 8-Core 76.8 11% 79.9 Pts	64-Core 80.9 5% 80.9 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS 2,044 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fujitsu(10CF 14A7) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.7% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.69 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.7% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90 12,565 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 189 200 197 158 172 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.4% Good	Read 247 Write 238 Mixed 230 SusWrite 181 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 53.9 4K Mixed 35.8 116% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 157 118% 158 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 131%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79 15,015 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 39GB free Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 115 113 105 111 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.3% Above average	Read 227 Write 137 Mixed 157 SusWrite 110 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 26.8 98% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 110 91% 131 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 79%
Generic SD64G SD Card 64GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 24GB free Firmware: 8.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7 7 7.1 6.8 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Read 3.5 Write 7 Mixed 4 SusWrite 6.9 4% 5.35 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1 229% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback