Supermicro C7X99-OCE

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro C7X99-OCE (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro C7X99-OCE
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160623
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '19 at 10:30
Run Duration	663 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 741 71% 586 Pts	64-Core 958 59% 958 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 844D) 1GB CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 17.6 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 21.5 14% 18.4 fps	MRender 21.3 Gravity 21.4 Splatting 15.1 15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 402 311 311 201 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 419 Mixed 385 SusWrite 204 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 52.9 182% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 347 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
Crucial M500 480GB-$84 9,168 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 150GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 3.6 385 299 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 402 Write 382 Mixed 328 SusWrite 114 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 34.2 131% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 35 105% 226 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 100%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 887GB free Firmware: 4.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 40 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.2% Below average	Read 95 Write 38.6 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 13.4 32% 43 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free Firmware: 4.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 43 44 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.7% Below average	Read 117 Write 42.8 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 14.5 44% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 33%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 369GB free Firmware: 4.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 102 100 101 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 94.1 Write 103 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 67.3 62% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 2.2 351% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 46%
DaneElec Z Mate 32GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 2GB free, PID 0000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.82% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 14.2 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 5.8 16% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.82% Great: 11%
Inateck 960GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 132GB free, PID 5136 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 307 310 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	215% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 330 Mixed 195 SusWrite 103 284% 205 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 25.6 2,720% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 80.2 DQ Mixed 31.4 3,879% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 220%
Inateck 960GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 225% 120GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 280 280 226 274 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	230% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 282 Mixed 178 SusWrite 177 282% 199 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 25.7 2,767% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 82.3 DQ Mixed 24.9 3,727% 43 MB/s
Poor: 219% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 230%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 44.6 MC Mixed 35.6 112% 39.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 20.3 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C7X99-OCE Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7X99-OCE

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	2x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	1x
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	1x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $105Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	1x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	1x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 8x8GBCorsairBench 113%, 390 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16