Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II P320-$20 3,972 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 49 1-Core 26.4 2-Core 29.7 26% 35 Pts	4-Core 38.8 8-Core 52.1 6% 45.4 Pts	64-Core 47 3% 47 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 1,871 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 143C) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.55% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 1.47 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 2.35 1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.55% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 220 248 240 245 225 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 312 Write 255 Mixed 189 SusWrite 229 55% 246 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 13.8 52% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 77.8 DQ Mixed 100 79% 111 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
PKI ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 2x8GB 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	109x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	36x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	26x

RAM
HP594908-HR1-ELD 2x2GBKingstonBench 24%, 207 samples	13x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	9x
HMT125S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 27%, 878 samples	9x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16