Lenovo Sabine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo Sabine  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torpedo
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '19 at 07:03
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3420M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 58.4
36% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 103
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
Legend(17AA 3970) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.22
0% 2.64 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3ZD60D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 56.1
Mixed 31
SusWrite 59.4
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3020EC58E9F133 NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Sabine Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo Sabine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback