Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81JQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 18:11
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 48.2
2-Core 85.4
41% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 263
27% 219 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 10 (Ryzen iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 22.7
13% 17.4 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 16.9
12% 15 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 296 253 255 262 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 603
Write 762
Mixed 677
SusWrite 280
131% 580 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 26.3
84% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 402
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 374
279% 370 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 141%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
730GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 76.7
Write 116
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 97.6
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
142% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HT Micron HTH5AN8G6NAFR-UHD Smart SF464128CK8IWGKFEG 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81JQ Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback