IBM 00J6520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIBM 00J6520  (all builds)
Memory155.3 GB free of 160 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 21:37
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 148
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 576
50% 425 Pts
64-Core 1,783
110% 1,783 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W5100
AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 27.6
16% 24.3 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 29
19% 23 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 599GB
558GB free
Firmware: 3.34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 196 196 196 195 195 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
191% Outstanding
Read 2,522
Write 1,732
Mixed 2,463
SusWrite 200
386% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 70.2
206% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 284
214% 284 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 191%
Great: 432%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3.34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 240 231 240 242 240 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
188% Outstanding
Read 2,365
Write 2,428
Mixed 2,443
SusWrite 243
419% 1,869 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 70.7
209% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 286
215% 285 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 188%
Great: 390%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 249GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 83 68 67 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 Kingston 9965516-130.A00LF 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 Kingston 9965516-130.A00LF 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 Kingston 9965516-130.A00LF 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 Kingsto... 160GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback