| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20110308 |
| Uptime | 10.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 25 '19 at 17:38 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54%
Above average
|
47% 71.5 Pts
|
24% 192 Pts
|
14% 221 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gainward(10B0 1187) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.7%
Poor
|
20% 25.8 fps
|
24% 30 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 79 65 66 78 69 MB/s
|
44.1%
Average
|
32% 145 MB/s
|
89% 31.5 MB/s
|
34% 53.9 MB/s
|
|
Microsoft Storage Space Device 119GB
26GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 131 98 94 96 73 MB/s
|
48.2%
Average
|
39% 173 MB/s
|
97% 32.8 MB/s
|
41% 58.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
29.3%
Poor
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
18% 6.3 GB/s
|
48% 84 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 48x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 40x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 31x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $268 |