| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HP4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20130509 |
| Uptime | 2.8 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 05 '19 at 20:31 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 68% |
PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
50.4%
Above average
|
51% 77.7 Pts
|
20% 155 Pts
|
11% 176 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
|
6.08%
Terrible
|
0% 16.4 fps
|
18% 21.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 45 45 65 43 63 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
48% 65.3 MB/s
|
138% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
30.6%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
26% 8.97 GB/s
|
46% 87.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-HP4 Builds (Compare 34 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HP4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 8x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 6x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 8x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $312 |