Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8710w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8710w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30C3
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime75 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9500-$160
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 68.4
31% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 68.2
8-Core 66.6
9% 67.4 Pts
64-Core 68
4% 68 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 320M
HP(103C 30C3) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 0.41
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.65
2% 1.86 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250410AS 250GB-$42
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 69 53 66 62 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 79
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 62.6
42% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8710w Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8710w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback