Acer Predator G3610

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3610 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G3610
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110913
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '19 at 14:00
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 185 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 358 47% 353 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 83AE) 1GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 22.9 Parallax 17.4 16% 19.9 fps	MRender 27.3 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 22.9 19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB 5,978 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 82 82 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 355 Write 291 Mixed 282 SusWrite 80.7 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 15.8 81% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 89.4 DQ Mixed 19.9 26% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 66GB free Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.74% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 19.1 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 20.9 5% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 7 24% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 9.74% Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 82 83 81 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 81.7 Write 77.2 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 81.1 55% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.8% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3610 Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3610

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	194x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	64x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	27x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	23x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
ACR512X64D3U13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,166 samples	24x
NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 227 samples	17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $346

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16