Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGbt___ AWRDACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-8S648
Memory0.4 GB free of 1.25 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20030924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 01:18
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2.40GHz
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Memory 5.13
1-Core 14.3
2-Core 16.9
7% 12.1 Pts
4-Core 19.1
8-Core 23.5
3% 21.3 Pts
64-Core 26.5
2% 26.5 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 21%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200
Device(0000 0000) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.6.8.5
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.12
0% 0.07 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6Y080L0 82GB-$60
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR41BW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9 8.9 6.7 6.3 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 10.3
Mixed 11
SusWrite 7.9
8% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
12% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
26GB free
Firmware: 0003DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 27 24 17 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 17.2
Write 18.6
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 21.6
14% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
256, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.2
3% 0.9 GB/s
Latency 452
9% 452 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ AWRDACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback