ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard EasyNote TM85

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Packard EasyNote TM85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TM85
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '16 at 17:32
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 135 52% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 170 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 1,680 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 1GB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4198 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.48 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 2.26 2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 7GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.4% Poor	Read 247 Write 158 Mixed 80.7 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 5.43 27% 8.13 MB/s	DQ Read 32.8 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 7.18 9% 17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 41%
Sandisk S064G 63GB 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2342 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1129 (A5) Unknown 100 100 201846 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 51 (AE) Unknown 100 100 85 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 45 236223987757 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 170 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 313 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5665471289 (F2) Unknown 100 100 8349503252	29.1% Poor	Read 245 Write 158 Mixed 26.8 31% 144 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 8.71 4K Mixed 5.58 30% 8.66 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 9.43 DQ Mixed 6.36 9% 17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 47%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 24GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 5338 (03) Spinup time 190 185 1458 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6094 (05) Reallocated sector count 41 41 1270 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22874 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3478 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1073 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 45 45 465118 (C2) HDA temperature 114 85 33 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 781 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 197 38 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	20.3% Poor	Read 35.8 Write 34.8 Mixed 22.8 23% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.27 4K Mixed 0.17 38% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GB 1,570 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.6 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical EasyNote TM85 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TM85

CPU
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	15x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	10x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	20x
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
S280 1TBKingdianBench 85%, 769 samples	2x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	6x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 28%, 1,570 samples	4x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback