ADD TO PC
BUILD

Default NPS-003

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Default NPS-003 (all builds)
Motherboard	Default NPS-003
Memory	3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160621
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '16 at 07:38
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G3900E 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.5% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 36.8 2-Core 155 53% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 155 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GMTS400TPR 64GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0918B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 128 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 15 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 54 (A3) Unknown 100 100 14 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1431 (A5) Unknown 100 100 7 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 58 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1796 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1267 (F5) Unknown 100 100 2862	50.1% Above average	Read 406 Write 75.8 Mixed 121 43% 201 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 17.6 84% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 68.6 DQ Mixed 34.5 43% 77 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 64%
SMI USB DISK 4GB 2,026 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 4.86 Mixed 6.49 10% 9.69 MB/s	4K Read 5.13 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.007 20% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5644EB0-CPB 2x2GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 21.6 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $216	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback