Asus F1A75-M-PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M-PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '19 at 07:03
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3650 APU 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 44% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 81 44% 66.5 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 154 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D 4,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.863.0.0 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	3.06% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 5.04 Parallax 2.91 3% 3.85 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 4.78 3% 3.94 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.06% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 148 142 153 152 150 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.5% Above average	Read 200 Write 109 Mixed 172 SusWrite 145 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 23.2 91% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 143 110% 149 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580 15,105 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 590GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 119 118 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 119 Write 119 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 118 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 75%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 11GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 27 25 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 24 Write 18 Mixed 6 SusWrite 27.6 25% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DCLT4GN568S 2x4GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 13.4 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.3 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M-PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M-PRO R2.0

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	7x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	1x
Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	2x
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
330 Series 120GBIntel $188Bench 68%, 11,188 samples	1x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x2GBKingstonBench 65%, 117 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 61%, 11,630 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $116

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16