Average Bench: 37.6% (127th of 683)

Based on 99,661 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 6798 Models: AMD Radeon R9 200, ASUS R9 280X, AMD Radeon R9 200 / HD 7900

Poor average bench

The AMD R9 280X averaged 62.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 47.3fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 48.4fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 280X is just 11.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 280X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 35.3fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 59.4fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 99,661 samples)
Min Avg Max
37.7 Lighting 47.3 53.9
21.8 Reflection 35.3 40.6
47.1 Parallax 59.4 69.5
38.2% 47.3 fps
Min Avg Max
27.4 MRender 31.1 35.6
42 Gravity 48.4 55.8
21.3 Splatting 24.4 28
36.7% 34.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 2770) 3GB
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 59.5
39% 48.2 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 24.5
37% 35 fps
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 59.1
39% 47.8 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 24.9
38% 35.4 fps
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 55.2
37% 44.7 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 21.2
34% 32 fps
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 53.4
38% 43.8 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 21.9
32% 30.5 fps
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 54.3
34% 42.7 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 44.2
Splatting 22.1
34% 31.7 fps
99,661 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 54,218,495 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 99,661 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $230 @ launch in Oct '13)
Sapphire(174B 3001) 26% 37% ± 6%
Sapphire R9 280X 3GB Dual-X OC
11221-00-20G
Sapphire R9 280X 3GB VAPOR-X
11221-20-20G
Sapphire R9 280X 3GB TOXIC
11221-01-40G
AmazonUS $5002 years
XFX(1682 3001) 11% 37% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 3001) 9% 40% ± 3%
Gigabyte R9 280X 3GB WINDFORCE OC REV3
GV-R928XOC-3GD REV3
Sapphire(174B 3000) 7% 36% ± 3%
Asus(1043 3006) 7% 39% ± 4%
MSI(1462 2775) 6% 38% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 3001) 4% 37% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 4% 36% ± 5%
PwrHis(1787 2317) 3% 35% ± 5%
PwrHis(1787 3001) 3% 38% ± 3%
XFX(1682 3211) 2% 37% ± 2%
XFX(1682 3212) 2% 34% ± 5%
Asus(1043 3004) 2% 35% ± 4%
AMD(1002 0B00) 2% 36% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0446) 2% 36% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 2261) 1% 42% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0442) 1% 35% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0448) 1% 38% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E208) 1% 37% ± 5%
MSI(1462 2770) 1% 39% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3213) 1% 37% ± 2%
MSI(1462 2774) 1% 40% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0418) 1% 35% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2777) 1% 39% ± 1%
AMD(1002 3000) 1% 43% ± 3%
Asus(1043 044C) 1% 41% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0420) 1% 39% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 201C) 0% 35% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3214) 0% 28% ± 12%
Asus(1043 3001) 0% 41% ± 0%
Asus(1043 044A) 0% 40% ± 1%
Asus(1043 3003) 0% 39% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 42% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 3000) 0% 40% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 280X Builds (Compare 16,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $799

Popular R9 280X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 8 years ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

19 days ago.

stupid gpu dont beat rtx 2080 ti


Liked

5 months ago.

Comment 

I have Sapphire R9 280X Toxic Edition. Factory Overclocked and better performance than the standard 280X. Not as widely available and cost upwards of £200, performance is more in line with the R9 290 reference card, at times exceeding it.—May '15


Excellent

4 months ago.

I used it for 7 years and it is still fine to play.. its clear that there are better ones but if u want to play simple games - its worth and lifes very long


Excellent

7 months ago.

Amazing card in 2021, can be found for 40 Canadian or under. Performs better price to performance wise than any other card in the market hands down and will run anything at 1080p. The 280x performs better than a 1050 ti for a third of the price. Just make sure to avoid the blower style cards as they get hot.

Comment 

Good card but not much better than my 6970—Feb '15


Poor

7 months ago.

Best card ever produced by AMD ( HD 7970 GHz )


Good

3 months ago.

bcoz i bought r9 280x in 5k second hand and its comparable to 1050 ti


Good

6 months ago.

Used this GPU for a long time. Cheap and works with everything at minimum 40fps on max graphics. Only downside is the 3GB of VRAM a little lacking when playing modern ish games like GTA5.


Good

3 months ago.

Card has remained supported and compfurtably powerfull enough to still run modern titles at reasonable frames. Great purchase to have made when the came out!


Excellent

8 months ago.

Have it for about 6 years now and still running many games on highest settings!


Excellent

10 months ago.

after 4 years of use still rocks :D but kinda warm :(


Excellent

18 months ago.

No its not just a HD 7970 with new bios. Almost but better. Legendary card


Average

2 years ago.

Good value for 2017 but not for 2020 : ps: Its best for the price than a 1030


Poor

13 months ago.

Overheating radiator FPS 40 AVG


Excellent

27 days ago.

Still playin with this and i7-975 at my cabin during summertime


Good

2 years ago.

having the tri-x vapor-x version its very good, only problem i have is the noise


Terrible

4 years ago.

low & very high price


Average

3 years ago.

Still a pretty good card.


Average

2 years ago.

Very good GPU..... But 1 bad thing is here... Is "old" 7970 with new BIOS ..... Yes,7000 series will be great bud new generation should be new,no "recycled"


Poor

3 years ago.

It died on me after 3 years!


Excellent

3 years ago.

Even though it was released in 2013 it can still be used to play most modern games at acceptable framerates. 10/10 would buy it again.


Excellent

3 years ago.

Great graphics card that can still run games at 1080p. I plan on building a new PC soon but this one served me well for years.


Excellent

19 months ago.

Old but gold


Your
opinion?
683 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $535Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback