Average Bench: 35.1% (159th of 715)

Based on 94,130 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 6798 Models: AMD Radeon R9 200, ASUS R9 280X, AMD Radeon R9 200 / HD 7900

Poor average bench

The AMD R9 280X averaged 64.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 47.8fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 48.9fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 280X is just 7.55%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 280X performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 34.6fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 59.5fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 94,130 samples)
Min Avg Max
41.9 Lighting 47.8 52.7
20.1 Reflection 34.6 39.9
51.4 Parallax 59.5 67.5
39% 47.3 fps
Min Avg Max
27.5 MRender 31.3 35.1
42.5 Gravity 48.9 55
21.3 Splatting 24.6 27.7
27.7% 34.9 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 52.1
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 67.4
42% 53 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 55.3
Splatting 27.8
31% 39.5 fps
MSI(1462 2774) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 64.1
42% 51.2 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 26.5
30% 37.6 fps
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 65.4
41% 51.6 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 26.9
30% 38.2 fps
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 62.6
40% 49.6 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 25.6
29% 36.5 fps
PwrHis(1787 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 54.3
41% 45.9 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 22.4
25% 31.5 fps
94,130 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,937,267 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 94,130 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $230 @ launch in Oct '13)
Sapphire(174B 3001) 24% 36% ± 2%
Sapphire R9 280X 3GB Dual-X OC
11221-00-20G
Sapphire R9 280X 3GB VAPOR-X
11221-20-20G
Sapphire R9 280X 3GB TOXIC
11221-01-40G
AmazonUS $5004 years
XFX(1682 3001) 16% 34% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 3001) 8% 37% ± 2%
Gigabyte R9 280X 3GB WINDFORCE OC REV3
GV-R928XOC-3GD REV3
Asus(1043 3006) 8% 36% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 6% 35% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2775) 6% 35% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 3001) 5% 34% ± 2%
PowerColor(148C 3001) 4% 34% ± 3%
Sapphire(174B 3000) 4% 33% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2774) 2% 36% ± 1%
Asus(1043 3004) 2% 33% ± 2%
XFX(1682 3212) 2% 33% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0448) 2% 35% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E208) 1% 33% ± 1%
Asus(1043 044C) 1% 38% ± 2%
Asus(1043 0442) 1% 32% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2261) 1% 37% ± 1%
XFX(1682 3214) 1% 33% ± 2%
XFX(1682 3211) 1% 35% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0B00) 1% 33% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1% 37% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 201C) 1% 32% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2317) 1% 34% ± 2%
Asus(1043 3003) 1% 37% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0444) 1% 35% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0446) 1% 34% ± 3%
XFX(1682 3213) 0% 34% ± 2%
Asus(1043 3005) 0% 34% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2780) 0% 38% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 35% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0418) 0% 33% ± 0%
Asus(1043 044A) 0% 26% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2770) 0% 35% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0420) 0% 35% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 280X Builds (Compare 2,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $799

Popular R9 280X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 10 years ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

18 months ago.

userbenchmark are great - they cut clean through marketing BS


Disliked

16 months ago.

Comment 

I have Sapphire R9 280X Toxic Edition. Factory Overclocked and better performance than the standard 280X. Not as widely available and cost upwards of £200, performance is more in line with the R9 290 reference card, at times exceeding it.—May '15


Good

12 months ago.

I used it for 7 years and it is still fine to play.. its clear that there are better ones but if u want to play simple games - its worth and lifes very long


Excellent

13 months ago.

Amazing card in 2021, can be found for 40 Canadian or under. Performs better price to performance wise than any other card in the market hands down and will run anything at 1080p. The 280x performs better than a 1050 ti for a third of the price. Just make sure to avoid the blower style cards as they get hot.

Comment 

Good card but not much better than my 6970—Feb '15


Good

2 years ago.

bcoz i bought r9 280x in 5k second hand and its comparable to 1050 ti


Good

23 months ago.

Used this GPU for a long time. Cheap and works with everything at minimum 40fps on max graphics. Only downside is the 3GB of VRAM a little lacking when playing modern ish games like GTA5.


Good

2 years ago.

Card has remained supported and compfurtably powerfull enough to still run modern titles at reasonable frames. Great purchase to have made when the came out!


Good

11 months ago.

Have it for about 6 years now and still running many games on highest settings!


Excellent

2 years ago.

after 4 years of use still rocks :D but kinda warm :(


Average

4 years ago.

Good value for 2017 but not for 2020 : ps: Its best for the price than a 1030


Poor

2 years ago.

Overheating radiator FPS 40 AVG


Excellent

24 months ago.

Still playin with this and i7-975 at my cabin during summertime


Good

4 years ago.

having the tri-x vapor-x version its very good, only problem i have is the noise


Average

5 years ago.

Still a pretty good card.


Average

4 years ago.

Very good GPU..... But 1 bad thing is here... Is "old" 7970 with new BIOS ..... Yes,7000 series will be great bud new generation should be new,no "recycled"


Excellent

5 years ago.

Even though it was released in 2013 it can still be used to play most modern games at acceptable framerates. 10/10 would buy it again.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Great graphics card that can still run games at 1080p. I plan on building a new PC soon but this one served me well for years.


Excellent

3 years ago.

Old but gold


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback