Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac13,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac13,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-FC02E91DDD3FA6A4
Memory17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime11 Days
Run DateNov 20 '16 at 07:52
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 156
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 381
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680MX
Apple(106B 010D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7586
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 34.3
22% 28.8 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 22.6
23% 29.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD ST3000DM001 3TB
524GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AQ03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 145
Write 139
Mixed 120
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac13,2 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac13,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback