Asus K52JU

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus K52JU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K52JU
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101028
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '19 at 22:52
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 64.8 1-Core 56.8 2-Core 103 46% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 141 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M 2,918 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C92) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.35% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.91 1% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.22 2% 1.76 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.35% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 97 90 93 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 190 Write 124 Mixed 151 SusWrite 94.1 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 17.3 67% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 80.8 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 102 78% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 80CE M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K52JU Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JU

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	15x
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	6x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6300MAMDBench 1%, 2,918 samples	43x
Radeon HD 6370MAMDBench 1%, 535 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6300M Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 20 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	9x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4GBUnknownBench 23%, 18 samples	4x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16