Lenovo 2325AU3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2325AU3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325AU3
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 23:52
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 143
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 217
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 320GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 113 71 65 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 29.3
Write 25.8
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 91.5
31% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.6 6.7 6.7 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 7.1
11% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback