ACER ASM5630/ASM3630/VTM460/VTS460

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemACER ASM5630/ASM3630/VTM460/VTS460  (all builds)
MotherboardACER EG31M
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 08:03
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 55.6
36% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 111
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600GS
Sapphire(174B 8090) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.35 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 2
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 59 48 45 50 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 56.8
Mixed 40
SusWrite 49
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30%
Great: 37%
IC35L120AVVA07-0 124GB
109GB free
Firmware: VA6OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Read 3
Write 3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.2
2% 3.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASM5630/ASM3630/VTM460/VTS460 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER ASM5630/ASM3630/VTM460/VTS460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback