| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180326 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 16 '19 at 14:20 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
69.4%
Good
|
75% 126 Pts
|
37% 278 Pts
|
17% 273 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
18% 20.1 fps
|
12% 16.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 17 37 18 35 4.9 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
24% 111 MB/s
|
66% 23.7 MB/s
|
48% 59.9 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
140GB free
Firmware: AB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 56 57 56 55 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
38% 51.1 MB/s
|
149% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
|
106% 89 MB/s
|
93% 2.63 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
48.3%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
60% 66.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,008 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 463x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 296x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 223x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 303x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 201x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 173x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $293 |