Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X10DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10DAI
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150129
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '19 at 19:06
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 164 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 604 55% 460 Pts	64-Core 1,600 99% 1,600 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	22% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 26.7 Parallax 33 21% 28.4 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 25.3 Splatting 26.9 24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 299 304 304 305 306 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 435 Mixed 371 SusWrite 318 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 44.1 153% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 339 256% 345 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 592GB free Firmware: MK7OAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 84 83 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 83.5 Write 84.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 83.3 54% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 946GB free Firmware: MK7OAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 120 Write 112 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 104 72% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix (date:15/13) HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 4x16GB 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.8% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 22.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 18.8 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	12x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	9x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	7x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	4x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 8x8GBHynixBench 109%, 271 samples	3x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $206

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16