Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 03:17
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 101
52% 80 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 276
29% 232 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84AC) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20.3
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 17.2
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 258 258 257 255 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 384
Mixed 372
SusWrite 273
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 51.9
174% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 254
191% 255 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 183 182 184 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
926GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 95 96 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 95.6
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 68%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
76GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 112 111 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 124
Write 117
Mixed 59
SusWrite 110
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback