DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory1.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 20:44
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 86
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 111
53% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 257
27% 219 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 23.2
14% 19.9 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 19
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 122 79 61 62 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 219
Write 170
Mixed 101
SusWrite 81.8
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 12.7
45% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 41.8
DQ Mixed 47.9
44% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 106%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
961GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 109 110 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 102
Write 94.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 110
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 86%
H/W RAID 5 12TB
821GB free
Firmware: 9999
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 47 46 65 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 43
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 53.1
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback