Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 35.6 1-Core 35.8 2-Core 71.6 28% 47.7 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 132 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9071) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.81 1% 0.92 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 847GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 79 120 129 143 182 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 197 Write 161 Mixed 174 SusWrite 126 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 16.1 50% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 85.6 DQ Mixed 103 75% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 133%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 129GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 55GB free Firmware: 02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 13 14 15 16 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	9.05% Terrible	Read 18 Write 11.5 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 13 11% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.05% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 224 18% 224 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM