Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2800 451 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 50.2 1-Core 8.2 2-Core 16.1 20% 24.8 Pts	4-Core 26.7 8-Core 26.8 4% 26.8 Pts	64-Core 26.6 2% 26.6 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Intel(8086 2012) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1096 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 0.69 Parallax 0.59 1% 0.82 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Plextor M5M mSATA 64GB-$94 128 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 62 63 71 62 63 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 245 Write 41.4 Mixed 95.8 SusWrite 58.3 24% 110 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 4.5 40% 9.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 83%
Sabrent Rocket nano 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 469GB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 26.4 Write 22.2 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 22.5 32% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 5.3 364% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 193%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x 1x4GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.2 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16