Acer Predator PT715-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator PT715-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Falcon_KLS
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 13:11
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 215
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 591
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Acer(1025 123E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1771 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 136
Parallax 106
88% 117 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 111
Splatting 101
87% 107 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme LITEON CA1-8D512 512GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B891201 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 365 380 419 415 412 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,217
Write 945
Mixed 279
SusWrite 446
160% 722 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 65.3
216% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 1,059
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 184
272% 531 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 175%
Great: 175%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 250GB
188GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 212 212 212 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 364
Write 252
Mixed 241
SusWrite 211
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 26.1
87% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 94.1
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 107
79% 103 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
865GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 83.3
106% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 118 118 117 121 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 129
Write 110
Mixed 80
SusWrite 116
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 59%
ADATA HD710 1TB
883GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 99.8
Write 100
Mixed 36
SusWrite 65.1
97% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3B1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PT715-51 Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Acer Predator PT715-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback