Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 160 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 231 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 153 150 156 144 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 359 Write 197 Mixed 233 SusWrite 152 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 31.6 108% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 144 124% 185 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 87%
ST500VT000-1DK14 500GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 233GB free, PID 1068 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 25.4 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 28.1 36% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	35x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	31x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $571