HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EC
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160721
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 153
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 235
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 81EC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6518
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 6.25
0% 4.94 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 13.2
8% 8.94 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 66 61 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 71.9
Write 66.2
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 62.5
41% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2400.C8ET Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback