Asus F2A85-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 10:36
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 113
51% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 189
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Asus(1043 8526) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 6.59
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 4.57
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 344
Write 114
Mixed 145
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 22
72% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 98.1
DQ Mixed 63.2
73% 128 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 89%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
128GB free
Firmware: 51.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.3
Write 68.1
Mixed 25.1
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Verbatim Store n Go Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID 0238
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.4
Write 4
Mixed 2.7
8% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
46GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.6
Write 44.6
Mixed 6
32% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.8
101% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback