Rausch 410045

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRausch 410045  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SSL-F
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 07:44
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 242
61% 120 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 599
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9440-8i 1TB
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 612 525 581 594 663 615 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 26.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback