Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265 6,606 User benchmarks, average bench 48% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	43% Average	Memory 66 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 103 47% 75.4 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 141 16% 128 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D + R7 240 Dual Graphics 23 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Device(1B0A 90DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.13% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 3.81 Parallax 4.88 3% 4.04 fps	MRender 4.71 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 5.04 4% 4.54 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.13% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 608GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 181 187 182 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 32.2 Mixed 76 SusWrite 179 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB 7,106 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 4.6 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM