Supermicro H8SCM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro H8SCM  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8SCM
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100723
Uptime23.6 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 14:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 4171 HE
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 60.6
40% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 176
19% 149 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000
HP(103C 0770) 2.5GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 14.2
11% 15.6 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 16.7
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 183 191 186 189 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.9% Average
Read 218
Write 190
Mixed 190
SusWrite 183
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 19.9
66% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 124
98% 136 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$92
2TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 121 80 113 120 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 130
Write 117
Mixed 30
SusWrite 111
70% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H8SCM Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro H8SCM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback