HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86D4
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 22:43
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 40.2
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 105
40% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 472
42% 354 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 638 634 625 502 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 674
Write 586
Mixed 609
SusWrite 588
138% 614 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 38.3
136% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 420
306% 404 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 122%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 22.4
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.1
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx Builds (Compare 2,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback