Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 78 2-Core 158 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 577 52% 435 Pts	64-Core 804 50% 804 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.9 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Lighting 45.4 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 51.9 37% 46 fps	MRender 52.5 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 38.5 35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 61GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 54 49 66 17 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.1% Average	Read 274 Write 136 Mixed 134 SusWrite 53.7 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 19.5 67% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 34.3 DQ Mixed 48.3 63% 122 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 85%
LSI MR9260-4i 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 65 63 64 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	81.6% Excellent	Read 221 Write 20.8 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 63.6 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-024.A00LF 8x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89% Excellent	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 32.6 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 58%, 8,730 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GBKingstonBench 57%, 3,744 samples	9x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $843