ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung SBB-DA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Samsung SBB-DA (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Ballina
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '20 at 05:08
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD RX-425BB R6 Graphics 28 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 57.3 2-Core 97.4 44% 71.2 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 161 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 25 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1022 1234) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5.5% Terrible	Lighting 6.57 Reflection 7.73 Parallax 8.97 5% 7.76 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 6.67 Splatting 7.83 6% 6.94 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.5% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 32GB 373 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 78 97 97 102 99 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 396 Write 88.2 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 93.7 33% 154 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 9.2 43% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 9 DQ Mixed 12.3 11% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 41%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.9 9.2 8.8 8.6 9.3 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	9.8% Terrible	Read 30.7 Write 6.2 Mixed 14 SusWrite 8.5 17% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 2.5 128% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FSFF65F-C8KL9 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.5% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 14.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.6 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback